Etlworks vs. Airflow

Compare a modern low-code data integration platform with the leading code-first orchestration framework.

Side-by-side Comparison
Feature Etlworks Apache Airflow
Category Low-code + code-first hybrid integration and orchestration platform Open-source Python-based workflow orchestrator
Primary Audience Data teams wanting full integration + orchestration without heavy DevOps Engineering teams preferring Python-defined workflows
Focus ETL, ELT, CDC, orchestration, API integration, transformations, automation Pipeline orchestration, scheduling, DAG execution
Skill Requirement Low to intermediate (visual UI + optional scripting) High (Python, DevOps, Docker/Kubernetes)
Setup & Maintenance No-code setup, fully managed cloud or on-prem, minimal DevOps High DevOps effort: cluster management, schedulers, workers, logs
ETL & Transformations Built-in mapping, SQL/JS/Python, lookups, enrichment, normalizing, CDC flows No native ETL engine. Requires writing custom Python tasks or external tools
API Integration Check Requires custom Python operators or plugins
Data Replication / CDC Log-based CDC, Full, Incremental, real-time agents No CDC. Must integrate 3rd-party tools
Code-First Support Full scripting: SQL, JavaScript, Python, Shell; run locally or remotely Python only
CLI Experience Full integrated CLI: commands, scripts, data queries, remote execution Basic CLI for DAG management
Automation Capabilities Events, triggers, schedules, webhooks, queues, file watchers, agents Primarily cron-like scheduling + DAG dependencies
Error Handling & Recovery Automatic retries, reruns, partial loads, error pipelines Retries + email alerts only; custom coding for advanced recovery
Scalability Horizontal and vertical scaling, multi-node, HA Scales well but requires Kubernetes or Celery setup
Observability Built-in monitoring, logs, data previews, metrics, lineage-lite Requires additional tools (Grafana, Prometheus, ELK)
Deployment SaaS, on-prem, hybrid-cloud agents Self-managed; requires container orchestration
Total Cost of Ownership Low; no infrastructure or development burden High; Python development + cluster maintenance
Pricing $300–$4500+ monthly Free open source; high ops cost for production usage
Difference

Why Teams Choose Etlworks Over Airflow

End-to-End Integration, Not Just Orchestration

Airflow orchestrates tasks but does not handle ETL, CDC, transformations, or API integration natively. Etlworks includes all of this out of the box, reducing tooling sprawl.

Full Code-First and Low-Code Flexibility

Etlworks supports SQL, JavaScript, Python, and Shell. Code can run inside the platform or remotely using agents. Airflow requires Python for everything.

Integrated CLI and Automation Engine

The new Etlworks CLI executes commands, pipelines, scripts, and transformations locally or across nodes. Airflow offers a basic DAG management CLI only.

No DevOps Required

Airflow requires ongoing maintenance of schedulers, workers, queues, logs, and databases. Etlworks runs fully managed or lightweight on-prem without cluster complexity.

Upgrade to a Modern Orchestration + Integration Platform

Airflow is powerful, but requires Python expertise and constant DevOps effort. Etlworks provides the same orchestration flexibility with a complete ETL, CDC, API integration, and automation stack built in.

Get in Touch

Sending your message...
Your message was successfully sent!

Ready to Start Using Etlworks?

Try 14 Days Free
Start free trial
Get a Personalized Demo
Request Demo